· 供应链分析
涉及标的： $XRP
自费用被销毁以防止通过供应销毁进行DDoS攻击以来，没有人... 这是一个过度简化的说法，但更类似于机构社区志愿者工作，以维护网络，而不是像ETH PoS那样有费用激励。只是不同的网络共识和方式。 我看到XRP被采用为机构间的结算机制（类似于Customers Bank Instant Token），并且由于即时最终性/低费用，我个人为跨境结算部分构建了一些应用程序（与美国银行代币相比），但在地址和最低余额方面有很多烦人的问题，就像Polkadot在入职/死资本方面一样，并且不像EVM那样广泛采用的脚本，你可以在Polygon到L2上部署相同的合约。
Nobody since fees are burned to prevent ddos via supply burn. Oversimplification but it’s more like institutional community volunteer work in terms of maintaining the network rather than having fee incentive like eth pos. Just different network consensus and approach. I see xrp being adopted as a settlement mechanism in between institutions (kind of like Customers Bank Instant Token) and personally built some applications for cross country settlement part (vs. US bank tokens) just due to instant finality/low fees, but there’s a lot of annoying issues regarding addresses and minimum balances like Polkadot with onboarding/dead capital, and not widely adopted scripting like EVM where you can deploy the same contracts across polygon to l2.